There were several reasons why the Industrial Revolution started in Great Britain rather than in France, the other great powers of the day. In the first place, Britain had the money necessary to finance the larger enterprises. England's supremacy on the seas had encouraged commerce, and Englishmen had been amassing wealth through there commerce and industry. The newly rich class in that country were not the aristocratic group, but merchants and businessmen who were willing to devote themselves to industry and scientific agriculture. The wealth of France, on the other hand, was largely in the hands of the nobility, and they were not willing to do the necessary work to develop industry. In the second place, Great Britain had undertaken very early the manufacturing of inexpensive and more practical products for which there would be ever-growing demand from the people, especially the new middle class. On the other hard, France produced articles in the luxury class. These could never be turned out in quantities because they demanded individuality. England was the producer of goods that were produced in quantities, and if she could find a cheaper means of producing them, her markets would grow. So she was ready for methods that would make it possible to manufacture in large quantities. In the third place, for a long time England had large numbers of semiskilled workers. When the feudal system broke down in England and the manors were turned to sheep raising, numbers of Englishmen went to the towns. There they engaged in weaving, making shows, wood carving and many other occupations that developed skills. When the industrial revolution began, these men were available for the work on the new machines. Moreover they were free men who could move from place to place as the need for workers arose. This had not been the case in France, which was still chiefly an agricultural country with peasants bound to their masters in many ways so they could not easily move to the cities. In the fourth place, coal was abundant in Great Britain, and a large amount of this cheap fuel was necessary for ruing the factories. There was coal in northern France, too, but France was late in tapping such resources because really everyone depended directly or indirectly on farming for his living.
1. Britain had the money necessary to develop industry because _____.
[A] Britain was much wealthier than France at that time
[B] Britain government encouraged the development of industry
[C] The merchants and businessmen were willing to fiancee the industry
[D] The aristocratic group was willing to develop the industry
2. According to the passage, French people attached importance to _____.
[A] the quantities of the articles
[B] the individuality of the articles
[C] the practicality of the articles
[D] the price of the articles
3. Which of the following statements is true?
[A] The wealth of France was largely in the hands of new middle class.
[B] French people were bound to the new machines.
[C] France was more likely to produce goods in qualities.
[D] France could not get free workers necessary to the industry.
4. When the industrial revolution began, Englishmen _____.
[A] were busy amassing wealth through commerce and industry
[B] had found a cheaper means of producing goods needed in qualities
[C] depended on farming for their living
[D] could move from plae to place as the need for workers arose
5. What can be inferred from the passage?
[A] The demand for luxury goods was limited.
[B] Industrial Revolution was the result of the interaction of various factors.
[C] French people farming to industry and commerce.
[D] Coal was very important to people's life.
参考答案：C B D D B
For the person keeping a journal, whatever he experiences and wants to hold he can write down. But to get it down on paper begins another adventure. For he has to focus on what he has experienced, and to be able to say what, in fact, the experience is. What of it is new? What of it is remarkable because of associations in the memory it stirs up? Is it a good or bad thing to have happened? And why, specifically? The questions multiply themselves quickly. As one tries to find the words that best represent this discovery, the experience becomes even more clear in its shape and meaning.
Beyond the value of the journal as record, there is the value of the discipline it teaches. The journalist begins to pay closer attention to what happens to and around himself. He develops and sharpens his skills of observation. He learns the usefulness of languages as a means of representing what he sees, and gains skill and certainty in the expression of his experiences. To have given up one's experience to words is to have begun marking out the limits and potential of its meaning. In
